37 facts in comparison. Granted, that GPU used a water-cooler while the Strix (the card we have in-house) is air-cooled, but it’s not just the cooler that’s large — Asus mounted the Fury on a standard-length high-end PCB as well. MW Technology 249,663 views. OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics. When AMD announced its potential “killer” of nVidia’s GeForce GTX 980 Ti - the Radeon R9 Fury X, the whole gaming community was quite intrigued whether it is going to be for real or not. Versus uses cookies to improve your experience on the site. Subscribing to a newsletter indicates your consent to our, ET Deals: Dell Vostro 14 5402 11th Gen Intel Core i5 Laptop for $649, Apple Watch SE for $249, CD Projekt Red Denies Any Plan to Offer Refunds for Cyberpunk 2077, Quake II RTX Now Runs on AMD GPUs Thanks to Vulkan Ray Tracing, These 20 USB Hubs are Still on Sale for an Extra 20 Percent Off, Asteroid Mission Successfully Collected Samples, Japan Confirms, AMD Radeon R9 Fury review: Splitting Nvidia’s GTX 980 and 980 Ti in performance. Two weeks ago, AMD released its new AIO liquid cooled flagship Fiji Fury X processor in a vain attempt to take the performance crown from Nvidia’s TITAN X and GTX 980 Ti. Direct comparisons pitting the AMD Radeon R9 Fury X vs. the GTX 980 Ti will be made, including coverage of EVGA's GTX 980 Ti Hybrid, a liquid-cooled competitor at the high-end. This newsletter may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links. 7.17 TFLOPS vs 3.189 TFLOPS AMD’s fans have touted their “fine wine” … Let us see, which one topples the other. Using more than one GPU in parallel can give increased performance. But let’s see what we can see from a quick run around the block, shall we? A higher transistor count generally indicates a newer, more powerful processor. The new GTX 980/970 cards replace the now discontinued GTX 780 Ti, 780 and 770. The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). While neither the Sapphire Tri-X or Asus Strix R9 Fury are that much bigger than other high-end air-cooled GPUs, they’re far larger than AMD’s diminutive Radeon Fury X. vs. Zotac GeForce GTX … Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. vs. Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card. Today, the company is launching its follow-up to the Fury X, the $549 Radeon R9 Fury. NVIDIA VS AMD … Small semiconductors provide better performance and reduced power consumption. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance. The AMD R9 Fury X sports a brand new Fiji GPU which succeeds Hawaii as AMD's … AMD Radeon R9 Fury X vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti. 9:34. One thing we can say about the R9 Strix — the card may be long and the fans + heatsink are large, but this card delivers excellent performance for very little noise. Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses). The number of GPUs supported when using a multi-GPU configuration. Why should we consider the AMD Radeon Fury … By continuing to browse our site, you agree to our use of cookies. The two high-end graphic cards present in the market are here for a faceoff. Nvidia GeForce GTX 970. Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU. We received our Asus test card on Wednesday at 5 PM for an 8 AM Friday launch. Chipsets with a higher number of transistors, semiconductor components of electronic devices, offer more computational power. AMD is bringing the card in at $549, or roughly $50 more than the GeForce GTX 980. To say that this review is coming in hot would be an understatement. Since then, we were all waiting impatiently for release to lay our hands on the “Red Fury… A small form factor allows more transistors to fit on a chip, therefore increasing its performance. The new GTX 980/970 cards replace the now discontinued GTX … Based on 126,098 user benchmarks for the AMD R9 Nano and the Nvidia GTX 980, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 652 GPUs. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. Intro AMD’s “fine wine” revisited – the Fury X vs. the GTX 980 Ti. This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. That’s not nearly as low as AMD’s 50C target for Fury X, but for an air-cooled card, 85C is quite good. Compare AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB & Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 4GB graphics card Gaming performance vs system requirement comparison Newer versions can support more bandwidth and deliver better performance. During that time, BTR has received an EVGA GTX 980 Ti SC+ card from EVGA for review, as well as purchased a Sapphire Fury … Peripheral Component Interconnect Express (PCIe) is a high-speed interface standard for connecting components, such as graphics cards and SSDs, to a motherboard. The heatsink and attached GPU are huge compared to previous cards, at 11.75 inches long and with significant cooler overhang. The GTX 980 Ti SLI and R9 Fury X Crossfire cards will be tested with default core and memory frequencies as well as a maximum stable overclocked configuration. The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed. Unfortunately, AMD’s rocket launch means that the 4GB HBM RAM comparisons I’ve wanted to do and wide-scale power consumption comparison are both on-hold for now. MW Technology 249,800 views. Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 … According to Asus, the GPU cooler is designed to maintain a maximum temperature of 85C. Random-access memory (RAM) is a form of volatile memory used to store working data and machine code currently in use. CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM USB FPS EFPS ... 970 980 980-Ti. As we saw in the last page AMD's R9 Fury X performs very similarly to Nvidia's GTX 980Ti at 4K, but as we lower the resolution we see that AMD … AMD R9 FURY X vs Nvidia GTX 980 TI - 4k Gaming Benchmarks - Duration: 9:34. If the R9 Fury and the GTX 980 were both $500 cards, we’d say the R9 Fury was absolutely the better solution, particularly if you’re gaming above 1080p. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view. One of the factors that sets the new Radeon R9 Fury apart from the Fury X is the size of the card. Asus is bringing the Strix R9 to market at $579, marginally higher than the $549 AMD is targeting for the R9 Fury in general. AMD R9 and NVIDIA GTX have come up with high-end graphic cards. vs. Palit GeForce GTX 1660 Ti StormX OC. The GTX 1070 is Nvidia’s second graphics card (after the 1080) to feature the new 16 nm Pascal architecture. Sapphire Nitro Radeon R9 Fury. [Sep '14 GPUPro] MORE DETAILS. vs. AMD Radeon R9 Fury. First up was the Fury X, a $649 card meant to compete with the GTX 980 Ti and sporting its own custom water cooler. Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 vs Sapphire Nitro Radeon R9 Fury. This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory. We strongly encourage you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY. AMD Radeon R9 390X. This new card uses the same base Fiji GPU as the Fury X, but with fewer cores (3584 as opposed to 4096). The R9 FURY has a 50 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 980 Ti, but the GTX 980 Ti has 32 more Render Output Units than the R9 FURY. Privacy policy, Asus ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 Super Gaming Advanced. Price comparison. We asked Asus why the Strix was so large, given that AMD was able to build both Fury X and the upcoming Fury Nano into much smaller cards, but the company declined to comment in detail, saying only “[W]e went with what works best for the chipset and cooling options.” We’ll have to wait and see if other vendors introduce Fury’s in smaller form factors, or if that capability is reserved for the upcoming Fury Nano. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps. Unlike the Sapphire version of the card, which offers 3x DisplayPort and 1x HDMI, the Strix packs 3x DisplayPort, 1x DVI-D, and 1x HDMI. A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It’s particularly impressive given that AMD’s last high-end air-cooled cards, the R9 290 and R9 290X, often ran right up to their 95C thresholds. Based on 149,774 user benchmarks for the AMD R9 Fury and the Nvidia GTX 980, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 651 GPUs. ... 390 390X Fury-X Fury Nano. Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image. Our power consumption figures are going to be somewhat higher in this review than in some previous stories — the 1200W PSU we used for testing was a standard 80 Plus unit, and not the 1275 80 Plus Platinum that we’ve typically tested with. The Radeon Fury’s clock speed has been cut slightly, to 1GHz (down from the Radeon Fury X’s 1050MHz), but the GPU packs the same 500MHz, 4096-bit HBM interface, 275W maximum board power, and dual 8-pin PCIe connectors. AMD R9 FURY X vs Nvidia GTX 980 TI - 4k Gaming Benchmarks - Duration: 9:34. Fortunately, Fury’s positioning is relatively straightforward. It is a quick-access, temporary virtual storage that can be read and changed in any order, thus enabling fast data processing. Given my other responsibilities for ET, the time I had to spend with this GPU was further compressed. Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display. The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second. The AMD R9 Fury … AMD Radeon R9 Fury X. Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth. AMD Radeon R9 390X vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti. This page is currently only available in English. Back in their heyday of mid-2015, the GeForce GTX 980 Ti and Radeon R9 Fury X were highly desirable graphics cards. It’s been nearly two years since BTR last compared the Fury X versus the GTX 980 Ti. That 2% OC isn’t going to push the envelope, and like the Fury X, Fury isn’t expected to have much overclocking headroom. One thing to like about the R9 Fury Strix, particularly if you have older monitors, is that the GPU supports a wide range of ports. AMD Radeon R9 Fury vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M, 3.98 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance, 4012MHz higher effective memory clock speed. Fury is going after ostensibly easier prey. Custom Radeon Fury, GTX 980 graphics cards brawl for PC gaming supremacy The AMD Radeon R9 Fury flew past the stock GTX 980 in benchmarks. AMD’s Fury X reliably delivered this kind of performance delta, but was priced to compete against the GTX 980 Ti, not the GTX 980. It’s not clear why Asus sampled on such short notice; manufacturers typically give much longer lead times when testing new hardware. AMD’s reference card is clocked at 1GHz standard, while the Strix clocks in at a maximum of 1020MHz out of the box. Mit der Radeon R9 Fury X gelang AMD der Wiedereintritt in die Oberliga der Grafikkarten, das neue Flaggschiff kann sich erfolgreich mit Nvidias Geforce GTX 980 Ti anlegen. The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second. The graphics card supports multi-display technology. Subscribe Today to get the latest ExtremeTech news delivered right to your inbox. First up was the Fury X, a $649 card meant to compete with the GTX 980 Ti and sporting its own custom water cooler. 10 NEAR IMPOSSIBLE Trophies on the PS4 - Duration: 12:40. GTX 980 Ti VS R9 Fury X - Max Settings at 1080p, 1440p and 4K . vs. AMD Radeon R9 290. vs. Nvidia GeForce GTX 970. vs. Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660. vs. Sapphire Nitro Radeon R9 Fury. The GTX … Add in some significant problems with testbed configuration (a series of unfortunate events so mind-boggling, I’m considering writing a post about them), and the end result was a badly compressed launch cycle. Why is AMD Radeon R9 Fury better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M? The modest reduction in total compute units is matched by a slight cut to texture mapping units (down to 224 from 256), but the total number of ROPS stayed the same, at 64. Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti. AMD R9 Fury X … © 1996-2020 Ziff Davis, LLC. Compare AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB Crossfire & Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Gigabyte WindForce 3X 4GB Edition graphics card Gaming performance vs system requirement comparison Intel Core i7-5960X … Based on 648,588 user benchmarks for the AMD R9 Fury and the Nvidia GTX 970, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 652 GPUs. Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort. 3.98 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance? PCMag Digital GroupExtremeTech is among the federally registered trademarks of Ziff Davis, LLC and may not be used by third parties without explicit permission. ... Sapphire Nitro Radeon R9 Fury. The latest AMD Catalyst 15.7 drivers and Nvidia GeForce 353.30 drivers were used. 9:34. UserBenchmark USA-User . Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort. DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics. ... AMD Radeon R9 390X. At that price point, the GPU needs to hit about 10% faster than its Team Green counterpart. The resulting card is the Asus Strix R9 Fury DirectCU III OC, but don’t let the OC get your hopes up. Fight! All of our tests were run on a Haswell-E system with an Asus X99-Deluxe motherboard, 16GB of DDR4-2667, and Windows 8.1 64-bit with all patches and updates installed. The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. At E3 last month, AMD announced that it would bring launch multiple GPUs under its new Fury brand. Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.